... issues and tissues with a touch of the spicy from the spirit hag ...
... which do you prefer ?
Published on June 28, 2004 By mignuna In Blogging


“would you rather have critical comments or no comments ?”


i was asked this recently in a comment on my poetry. it’s a very insightful question that i was glad to be asked. making a comment on poetry can be difficult. poetry is very personal, so it's not like a "normal" blog in which you can offer actual input. yet, if something you read touches you in any way, it’s a compliment to it’s author and they deserve to know about it.

there is the consideration that not all poetry is designed to arouse happiness or warmth, in fact some of the best poems i have read on here are the ones that made me feel confronted in some way. even though that may have been the authors' intention, it is still easier to walk away that to risk saying so and perhaps causing offence.

i mean, you really cannot read an angry poem and say “that made me feel ill” in your comment and expect to sound like you enjoyed the experience, can you ?.

neither can you comment on a sensual piece by saying “well, THAT got the old blood pumping, nudge-nudge, wink wink”.

so, what to do ?

i try and look at it this way: when i write a poem, i do actually want to know what others think - it's a real joy to have somebody "get" me that way. although, as i often ignore grammatical and punctuation rules, that would technically make a “critique” of my work a litany of “this was wrong” and “you changed tenses”, etc, which probably would sound offensive as a comment.

so, i'd say that i myself would rather have "critical" comments provided they take the form of relevance to the work somehow, and not a "your grammar is wrong" type of thing. as far as poetry is concerned, i think most of the bloggers on ju would prefer ANY comment than none at all. it really is very encouraging to have people comment on your more creative stuff. in a lot of cases, ju is the only feedback available, which makes it doubly valuable.

comments don't have to be a full dissection (but those of course are so welcome), even a quick "this made me think" or a shared experience you can relate it to (good or bad) is great. i have recently seen several wonderful poets express doubt at the appeal of their work/s due to few or no comments, and i think a little bit of support would go a long way.

i’d hate to see the “art” section of ju wither and die whilst still in it’s infancy ... (insert pathetic pleading tone ... here) ... so, please support your local ju starving poets ... just no saying you think it’s awful when aweful will do just as nicely




note: i'd like to thank sarah (aka bigdreamer) for asking me this question. judging by this blog, it was something i felt very passionate about without even realising !. kudos to you, sarah, for your insight. mig XXX.





Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Jun 29, 2004
I think there is a very distinct difference between criticising and critiquing. The former is just saying you don't like something (think of what's-his-name on American Idol), the latter gives the author imput as to what the person doesn't like and does so in such a way that the intent is to be helpful, rather than hurtful.
on Jun 30, 2004

I think there is a very distinct difference between criticising and critiquing


emoticon man, i do agree with your statements as applied in your example. titling my post "critical comments or no comments" was to enquire in a general way if people preferred to have "ego stroking" comments only, or if they would actually prefer to know if the reader had any objection at all - and it's so hard to define what standards or rules others may be applying to your work if they do object.

it's been genuinely eye opening have so many extra dimensions added to this article, and i'm alraedy regretting not going into more depth with it.

in particular, i'm pleased you made the point about the intent of the reader. it's something i didn't include, but it's a very good point in that we can assume that others may have similar motivations to us, when in fact they may be giving a quite deliberate mis-impression for their own reasons. so we also need to consider the source as being relevant, which can often be impossible.

thanks again, emoticon man for your input. it's very much appreciated


mig XX
2 Pages1 2