... why aren't we listening to this guy ?
in 1973, an australian doctor named john holt tried a form of radio therapy on a terminally ill cancer patient for the first time.
after injecting the patient with a solution to temporarily disable glucose suspension in the blood, dr holt used radiotherapy applied by directing waves in bursts directly at the site of the tumour. this caused the destruction of the tumour via overheating without causing any damage to surrounding healthy tissue.
after the patients' complete recovery, dr holt quietly went about his work of saving lives, successfully curing terminal cancers in the lymph system, breasts and bladder before submitting his findings to the australian medical world via a report on his therapies published in 1974.
remaining largely unnoticed until 1991, the western australian cancer council trialed dr holts' research and declared that it could find no evidence that this treatment 'cured cancer', despite dr holts’ distress that the tests were performed on an unsuitable rectal cancer by a non-specialist doctor.
since 1974, dr holt has cured over 300 cancer patients with his pain-free, side-effect free, non-invasive treatment. the only discomfort patients feel is a slight warmth. and for over 30 years, patient after patient has been writing to the australian medical council and the press with no result.
the doctor himself has never helped his own cause, maintaining a strict 'no publicity' ethic, and refusing interviews for most of his decades in practice. now aged 69, he has never actually claimed to have been able to cure cancer, and still does not.
the head of the oncology specialist unit at sydneys' royal prince alfred hospital recently heard 'through the grapevine' of dr holt, and sent to him a terminally ill cancer patient estimated to have 3 weeks to live after intensive chemotherapy failed to arrest his advanced cancers.
after seeing his patient restored to perfect health, the referring doctor had this to say:
"i do all i can to preserve human life. i heard about dr holts' treatment, and as this patient had no other chance, i owed him the right to know about it. as a doctor, i am happy to say this mans' life has been saved. but as a scientist, i cannot tell you why it has".
and the stories continue. from a 7 year old girl with a leukemia and a lifelong history of secondary tumours who is now cancer-free, to an 18yo woman with tumours in her bones and lungs who was given a month to live eight years ago.
described as 'not a money man', dr holts' treatments remain inexpensive and accessible. he retains a practice that is public access, and he still works in a public hospital. despite his continued success treating cancer, dr holt has published no further findings since his 1974 report was improperly tested by the western australian cancer council in 1991.
over the last 30 years, australia has expended hundreds of millions of dollars in cancer research, yet the man who may already have the answer plans to soon retire to ireland and live out his dotage peacefully, unknown except by the hundreds of australians' whose lives he has saved.
an unassuming man qualified in general practice, obstetrics and gynecology amongst others, dr holt has 22 letters after his name, yet has been quoted as saying he has "learned to shut up and practice medicine in peace and quiet".
when asked if he thought his detractors may be sorry in the long run for ignoring the potential of his treatment, he is said to have replied that "well, sooner or later, they may get cancer".
despite such a chequered career, dr holt is happy with his contribution to medical science. it is not known how long he will continue to be able to practice medicine, but one thing is for certain. this guy is onto something that could change the future of mankind.
let's just hope his work doesn't die with him.