... issues and tissues with a touch of the spicy from the spirit hag ...
... is this something we need to understand ?
Published on August 29, 2004 By mignuna In Current Events

Can psychology tell us what motivates terrorists and how they differ from you and me?. How do we get inside the mind of a killer ?. Most of us find terrorism acts alien to our thinking. We simply cannot ever hope to understand.

Yet maybe for our own sakes we should understand something of what fuels the violent reality of todays' world. Scientifically, it's a tough task, since terrorists generally don't volunteer for psychological studies. At any rate, terrorism experts tend to differ greatly in their understanding of the motivation behind these acts.

Three opinions from specialists in this field are reproduced below, without my pretending to say which is most compelling, or whether other answers would be more convincing.


Expert 1: “Anger without guilt”

For 30 years, Rona Fields, a Washington, D.C. psychologist, has been psychologically testing terrorists and paramilitaries from Northern Ireland, Israel, the West Bank, Lebanon, Southeast Asia, and Africa.

She thinks today's suicide terrorists share the still-born moral and emotional development she saw in the Khmer Rouge, who created a bloodbath in Cambodia during the late 1970s. "Their definition of right and wrong is very black-and-white, and is directed by an authoritative director," says Fields.

"There's a total limitation of the capacity to think for themselves, and a terrorist develops gradually from a young age" Fields says. The boys (typically aged 10 to 16) who are easiest to recruit for suicide terrorism are "at the stage of development of moral judgment called retributive justice or vendetta."

This "an eye for an eye" stage of emotional development was described by the Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget, she adds.

In "societies where there's been intergenerational, intercommoned war," Fields says, many adults never outgrow the vendetta, and are trapped in righteous indignation, which Fields found among "all the members of all paramilitary organizations I examined”.

These true believers, she adds, "do know that there's a difference between right and wrong, but when they do something in the name of the cause, it's justified. They are angry, but they don't feel guilty about their anger."



Expert 2: “Highly rational ?”

In contrast to the popular sense that suicidal terrorists are sociopathic whackos, many experts argue that they are effectively pursuing their goals.

"They are rational, they are not insane," says Richard Pearlstein, associate professor of political science at Southeastern Oklahoma State University. "They have goals and they are moving towards those goals."



Expert 3: “No Set Psychological Model”

Not only are terrorists not crazy, but they don't share a personality type, wrote David Long, former assistant director of the State Department's Office of Counter Terrorism. "No comparative work on terrorist psychology has ever succeeded in revealing a particular psychological type or uniform terrorist mindset."

Still, Long wrote that terrorists tend to have low self-esteem, are attracted to groups with charismatic leaders, and, not surprisingly, enjoy risk. Oddly, Long concluded that many terrorists are ambivalent about violence and guns.

Long wrote just before the ongoing wave of suicide attacks, where a focus on raising the death toll has superseded the desire to score a political point or free imprisoned comrades.


All original quotes are from: Link

Note: These are presented purely for information and comparsion purposes, and in no way represent my personal views, or imply in any way that I am sympathetic to the perpetrators of acts of terror. Discussion is welcomed. Thanks.


"
Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Aug 29, 2004
I would agree with the third explanation...

Interesting blog - I myself try my darndest to get inside the mind of terrorists, and I beleive I know what it is that sparks their hatred and outrage, my ability to point this out has me labelled as a terrorist sympathyser, when it's really as simple as saying dont fuel the fire with more hate.

Terrorists are an unknown quantity, and we have no way of telling which way they are going to react in any situation, we have to understand where this inner hatred comes from, and do anything within our power to negate that hate that we possibly can.

Sometimes, when you talk to people about terrorism, it's like banging your head against a brick wall, they are set in their ways, and are un-willing to entertain other ideas, if you are not one of these people, you are labled a hippy, kook, or a terrorist sympathyser, and that is a damn shame. Luckily that brick wall doesn't worry me too much - it's good for conditioning my head

BAM!!!
on Aug 29, 2004
I remember reading somewhere about a captured terrorist from the 70s who said the key to doing that sort of thing was to think of the victims as things. If you don't consider the target a person, then really there's no limits to what you can do. Who cares what happens to a half-brick? When that thought process is applied to people, then you get true evil.
on Aug 29, 2004
If you don't consider the target a person, then really there's no limits to what you can do.


It's all about trivialising death... I have an interesting article in preperation how the US tank operators just crank some really loud death metal to get them pumped for death and destruction...

BAM!!!
on Aug 29, 2004
Terrorists are an unknown quantity, and we have no way of telling which way they are going to react in any situation, we have to understand where this inner hatred comes from, and do anything within our power to negate that hate that we possibly can


i'm glad you added this, muggaz, as this is something i feel strongly about. the sheer inability of most decent people to comprehend such acts compromises our ability to protect ourselves from them.

Sometimes, when you talk to people about terrorism, it's like banging your head against a brick wall, they are set in their ways, and are un-willing to entertain other ideas, if you are not one of these people, you are labled a hippy, kook, or a terrorist sympathyser, and that is a damn shame


this can be true, mug. i think it's a natural part of being a decent person to feel confused outrage when terrorists commit acts that go against all that we know to be good. the very word strikes fear into my soul. and for this reason i'm vulnerable to such things. i will never agree with acts of terrorism. i will never support acts of terrorism. but i will say that our ignorance of WHY and how they happen will continue to cost this world dearly.



If you don't consider the target a person, then really there's no limits to what you can do. Who cares what happens to a half-brick? When that thought process is applied to people, then you get true evil.


thanks for adding this, cactoblaster. this is another fact that most us find incomprehensible. we need to be afraid. we need to be wary. we should never sympathise or agree with terrorism. but we should arm oursleves with the knowledge about it that might help us combat it ultimately.


thaks for the comments.

vanessa/mig XX
on Aug 29, 2004
"These true believers, she adds, "do know that there's a difference between right and wrong, but when they do something in the name of the cause, it's justified. They are angry, but they don't feel guilty about their anger."  Unless they are caught.
on Aug 29, 2004
“Highly rational ?” Hmm, rather Maxwellian. The frightening pretense of a superior race that answers to no one.  
on Aug 29, 2004
Unless they are caught.


a very good point, stevendedalus. in reference to repentance, this can de displayed on occasion. although many terrorists die during their 'campaigns', those that do survive and are brought to 'justice' may feel/display remorse over their anger, whilst still making no apology for it's source or it's motivations.

“Highly rational ?” Hmm, rather Maxwellian.


am i allowed to admit that that comment elicited a big laugh from me ?

The frightening pretense of a superior race that answers to no one.


i agree wholeheartedly, stevendedalus. the concept of such things are so alien to our natures that we put ourselves at a psychological disadvantage through sheer decency of spirit in these instances.

thanks for this insightful comment.

vanessa/mig XX

on Aug 29, 2004
I just read an article in the Bangkok Post about a Muslim kid who was arrested for (what else?) bombing a market. He gave a lengthy and frank interview on how he was recruited and why he did it. The religious nutcases get the kids when they are young, brainwash them, etc., pretty much what you'd expect.

When traveling in third world countires I am often reminded of the line in Platoon that "Hell is the absence of reason". Common sense isn't so common outside of the G8. I think the only thing that can save us is health and education. A hungry man is an angry man; an ignorant man is a belligerent man.
on Aug 29, 2004
Mig: Interesting post. I like the new, bold miggy.

David:

A hungry man is an angry man; an ignorant man is a belligerent man.


I find so much truth in that statement. Very well said.

on Aug 29, 2004
I just read an article in the Bangkok Post about a Muslim kid who was arrested for (what else?) bombing a market. He gave a lengthy and frank interview on how he was recruited and why he did it. The religious nutcases get the kids when they are young, brainwash them, etc., pretty much what you'd expect.


hi david. that sounds like a very interesting piece, i'm glad you mentioned it. it is true that children are 'recruited' whilst they are still young. i believed what my elders told me as a child, too. i was merely luckier geographically, and with a much different result.

"Hell is the absence of reason".


it is true. we fear most that we don't understand. and it is therein that our vulnerabilities lie.

I think the only thing that can save us is health and education. A hungry man is an angry man; an ignorant man is a belligerent man.


i very much agree, david. fear and misunderstanding make us prime targets. what we need to fight terrorism is not empathy, and never sympathy or support, but educated insight in how to prevent the self-perpetuating cycle. thanks for your comment.

vanessa/mig XX
on Aug 29, 2004
Mig: Interesting post. I like the new, bold miggy.


thankyou very much, texas wahine

I find so much truth in that statement. Very well said.


i second that, texas wahine. and thankyou for commenting.

vanessa/mig XX
on Aug 30, 2004
what we need to fight terrorism is not empathy, and never sympathy or support, but educated insight in how to prevent the self-perpetuating cycle.


Wow. I think what you've just said, mig, is so very insightful. I agree completely.
on Aug 30, 2004
Wow. I think what you've just said, mig, is so very insightful. I agree completely.


thanks so much again, texas wahine. i must say, we do seem to have a lot of similar views, and i very much appreciate your comments .

vanessa/mig XX
on Aug 30, 2004
Their definition of right and wrong is very black-and-white, and is directed by an authoritative director,"

we have to understand where this inner hatred comes from, and do anything within our power to negate that hate that we possibly can.


According to the expert, the hatred comes basically via brainwashing from their culture and/or leader. Three basic steps to negate that hate:
1) remove them from their culture.
2) remove their leader from them.
3) de-program them.

Anything else (e.g. appeasement, reparations, etc.) isn't going to cut it.
on Aug 30, 2004
1) remove them from their culture.
2) remove their leader from them.
3) de-program them.


4) don't incite further hatred by refering to ALL Muslims as Pigs, Murderers, Misogynist's, Rapist's etc.

BAM!!!

2 Pages1 2