big. fake. boobs.

... storm in a b-cup

Published on August 19, 2004 By mignuna In Misc

i have a rather burning question for the big fake boob loving males of the world ... what exactly is it about big fake boobs that you like ?.

is it the fact that a woman can exist regardless of this modern society who can still be made to feel shitty enough about herself to allow her body to be mutilated to please a man ?

is it the fact that a woman dumb enough to do that will also be likely to be dumb enough to let you screw her in every way ?

maybe it's the way those melons satisfy your need to have some big things visible to counteract other less obvious small things ?

could it be the way she chases her dreams by getting the big fake boobs that were so important to her ?

perhaps you admire her courage for taking a foreign and unstable substance into her body during an unnecessary major operation ?

it may even be the way she's so carefree about life that she doesn't even mind taking her chances with a 'modification' that blocks effective breast cancer screening ?

could it be the way it feels to know she loves you so much that she doesn't even mind that you're a shallow jerk who will dump her as soon as she hits 27 ?

gee. it might even come down to how you chose to live for the way things look rather than the way they feel ?

i just can't decide. i mean, there is just so much to admire about these women, isn't there ?.

Comments (Page 2)

kingbee

on Aug 20, 2004

I don't think that women who do things to make themselves feel more attractive should be called "dumb

i certainly didnt say that. as far as boob jobs go tho, its needless risk for no reasonable rate of return.

mignuna

on Aug 20, 2004

oh, and i can i add that i wasn't calling anyone dumb. the inference was that modifying your body solely to please or keep a man is dumb. and i stand by it only in that instance.

vanessa/mig XX

web_poet

on Aug 20, 2004

Its not the size that matters most- it's size and symmetry. Bigger is not always better. For me, big and symmetrical, challenging melons are the best. And there are many natural ones that fit the bill- why go for fake, I can't figure out.

Floozie

on Aug 20, 2004

A girl I went to school with was given a pair of boobs by her parents for her 16th birthday. I couldn't think of anything sadder. Apart from the fact that she wasn't fully developed, I wonder what other crap her parents were filling her head with. I guess we'll never know as she killed herself a few years later.

However, I am not trying to suggest that fake boobs cause people to commit suicide. Rather breast augmentation is a symptom of a society which finds it easier to value things which we perceive with our eyes than our minds. It is just an accepted form of self mutilation.

voiceofdissent

on Aug 20, 2004

I love them and the make sex more funner.

kingbee

on Aug 20, 2004

Because doctors run a baseline before they do the implants then strongly recommend a mammogram every 1-2 years no matter what the age is. Since most of the women who get implants are young, they get a mammogram (and continue to get them) at a younger age than the doctor recommended 40 years old. (I'm 32 and have never had a reason to have one, and the doctor says he doesn't typically do them until 40 without a reason). So, a technician taking extra scans on a young person with implants still has a better chance of catching early cancer than a young person who doesn't get one until a "lump" has been found.

i wouldnt think all the extra exposure to radiation is a plus.

kingbee

on Aug 20, 2004

A girl I went to school with was given a pair of boobs by her parents for her 16th birthday

dayyum i was born into the wrong family.

Lord Shitzu

on Aug 20, 2004

I for one am not much of a boob man myself in terms of pure attraction, preferring more intimate parts of the anatomy, but I can certainly appreciate a nice pair of breasts. To me, however, nice usually means no bigger than a C cup. Anything above that is way too big for my tastes, and A or B is just perfect in terms of balance and aesthetics.

Obviously that's just me, but as far as fake breasts go, I just see no appeal whatsoever, especially the incredibly excessive basketball variety.

notsohighlyevolved

on Aug 20, 2004

1) Capitol letters can be your friend, same with punctuation.
2) If something is a list, don't double space, and present it as a list. Otherwise, a double space shows the start of another paragraph or thought (like a one sentence being spaced).
3)Lists usually are preceded with consecutive numbers or letters, or by an asterisk or dash, or by saying "......the following:"

Karma - it seems that you are the only one that has had a problem with "interpretation". There is nothing in this post that exceeds two sentences, point by point, one logically following the other. This i have noticed time and again in Mig's writing. Always, unless taking artistic license in fiction, short and succinct paragraphs that contain single, whole ideas.

Sound writing.

Capital letters might be your best friend but most of us have proceeded beyond remedial grammar. Same goes for the numbers, letters or asterisks for lists. It is always the singularity of the idea in a sentence that determines a list, not particularly the identifiers.

Your argument about screening was acceptable in that it addressed points within the argument which you thought you read. Your emphasis, however, did not correspond to the emphasis of Mig's article. This is nothing but purile nit picking about issues that simply do. not. exist.

Marco

mignuna

on Aug 20, 2004

I see that a bit in your writing, and I have a feeling that people don't understand some of what you write.1) Capitol letters can be your friend, same with punctuation.

i'm sorry, but i don't think you really assume i don't know how to use punctuation do you, karma ?

i'm also sorry that you have a feeling people don't undertsand my writing. perhaps in this case you might apply this to yourself ?. this is the first such comment i have had in 211 articles. wow, you'd think everyone might have spoken up sooner if i was so hard to understand. thanks for letting me know.

really, we are both grown women. there wasn't a need to reduce it to that, karma. i really regret being put in this position.

vanessa.

Lord Shitzu

on Aug 20, 2004

I'd just like to add that while I do prefer proper capitalization, grammar, and all that, mignuna's writing is very readable and easy to understand.

I think lack of capitalization and all that is only a problem when the tone or vocabulary someone uses is... well... awful, like the typical internet message board stuff:
omg i went to back to skool yesterday and it was totaly like deja vu all the people were like "omg, its u"!!!!!! so then wsent and hung out at diary qeen and had ice creem it was awsome

There are several bloggers here, like mignuna or kingbee, who don't write with a lot of formalized capitalization and all that, but still write excellent articles and responses, which are clear, coherent, and downright engaging >8).

I don't think it's fair to criticise over things like that as long as the the writing is clear.

Also, Karma, I'd like to point out that you used the wrong "capitol" in your comment, the one you used means like a state capitol >8P.

KarmaGirl

on Aug 20, 2004

Also, Karma, I'd like to point out that you used the wrong "capitol" in your comment, the one you used means like a state capitol >8P

Actually, my spell and grammar changed a lot of stuff that I wrote wrong (or right, depending on how you look at it). Like it had "asstrick" in there. People take things too seriously...or maybe they take themselves too seriously, I'm not sure.... If anyone take me seriously, then they need to reread what I really write. (like things like: "personal boob choice"). I guess maybe I have been online too much......

mignuna

on Aug 20, 2004

Sorry to burst anyone's bubble- but pretty people have more opportunities than ugly people. It's just the way it is. Can an ugly musician ever make it big in todays world?

actually, i beg to differ, karma. i think that's an awful blanket statement to make. 'ugly' people are only ugly inside. and i would hardly call a lot of today's musicians attractive. it's all relative, i guess. i think it's about the music. i might see the world differently than you.

I'd just like to add that while I do prefer proper capitalization, grammar, and all that, mignuna's writing is very readable and easy to understand.

thankyou so much lord shitzu

You're not putting potentially dangerous chemicals INTO your body -- there are many horror stories about plastic surgery -- there aren't that many about makeup hair dye or body waxing -- NOTE I said that MANY - not there weren't any at all.

an excellent point, trina, thanks

I prefer em smaller and perky myself. I want something that'll be saying "Elloooo!!" to me in the morning

good on you, m_post !

There is so much to pity and, counter-intuitively, so very little to look at.

thanks, marco. i love clever men !!!

Great post, mig. Your stuff always makes me think

thankyou, texas wahine

altering natural healthy breasts for any reason--but especially for the sake of vanity and/or catering to another's preference--may be legal, but is senseless to the point of criminality. ive tried my best to discourage my female friends from pursuing it (not always successfully, dammit).

i'm glad you agree, kingbee. knew we could count on you !

Big natural ones are my style....fake bad....natural good!

alright, cigars !

Rather breast augmentation is a symptom of a society which finds it easier to value things which we perceive with our eyes than our minds. It is just an accepted form of self mutilation.

suz, thanks for this most insightful comment

i wouldnt think all the extra exposure to radiation is a plus.

i apologise, kingbee. it seems there was some joke we weren't a party to there.

Obviously that's just me, but as far as fake breasts go, I just see no appeal whatsoever, especially the incredibly excessive basketball variety

well said, lord shitzu. i'm glad you guys all agree !

thanks so much,

vanesa/mig XX

mignuna

on Aug 20, 2004

Karma - it seems that you are the only one that has had a problem with "interpretation". There is nothing in this post that exceeds two sentences, point by point, one logically following the other. This i have noticed time and again in Mig's writing. Always, unless taking artistic license in fiction, short and succinct paragraphs that contain single, whole ideas. Sound writing. Capital letters might be your best friend but most of us have proceeded beyond remedial grammar. Same goes for the numbers, letters or asterisks for lists. It is always the singularity of the idea in a sentence that determines a list, not particularly the identifiers.Your argument about screening was acceptable in that it addressed points within the argument which you thought you read. Your emphasis, however, did not correspond to the emphasis of Mig's article. This is nothing but purile nit picking about issues that simply do. not. exist. Marco

btw, thanks marco. those uni degrees of yours really come in handy sometimes, huh ?

*smooch*

vanessa XXXXX

Gideon MacLeish

on Aug 20, 2004

and i would hardly call a lot of today's musicians attractive.

Although you have to admit, on the male side of things, country is far uglier than rock.

As for the women: I won't even glance at a woman that has to purge after accidentally downing a sip of non-diet soda.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!